Trump-Putin summit: US no longer projects coherent identity to the world

.story-content span,.story-content p,.story-content div{color:#000!meaningful;font-family:‘open sans‘,Arial!meaningful;font-size:15px!meaningful} span.p-content div[id^=”div-gpt”]{line-height:0;font-size:0}

At the recent between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin, the U. S. president used the threat of nuclear war to justify good relations with a bad regime, just as he did in .

His rhetoric included overzealous articulations about how the and Russia control more than of the world’s nuclear weapons, demonstrating his penchant for uncomfortable power capabilities.

Trump has used America’s material resources to back up his threats to NAFTA, NATO, and the World Trade Organization, textbook examples of the use of what’s known as uncomfortable power. His approach to wielding have an affect on completely ignores soft power, which refers to the non-material assets a state can harness to gain have an affect on, including its culture, policies and political values.

Unlike its coercive counterpart, soft power rests on a state’s diplomatic capability to shape others’ preferences and the ability to get others to want to do what you want them to do.

ALSO READ:

But if Trump believes uncomfortable power is all that matters, then how can he explain his lack of regard for Chinese-American relations? And how can we think through for the drop in America’s soft power?

Trump’s meeting with Putin points out just how much soft power matters: It might matter enough, in fact, to reconfigure the entire power structure of the global political system.

Trump increased the 2018 U. S. defence budget to while in 2017, Russia decreased its budget for the first time in two decades, to . Despite its uncomfortable power disadvantage, Russia seems nonetheless to have a lot of have an affect on over the U. S.

Does this mean that Russia has a soft power advantage over the U. S.? No. What the Helsinki summit and Trump-Putin relations points out us, more broadly, is the erosion of America’s soft power capabilities.

No longer a coherent U. S. identity

a reordering of the global soft power roster, which captures the U. S. fall from the ranks. However, we know much less about how the Trump administration is weakening U. S. soft power. One explanation comes from the nuances of the concept of soft power. In short, inconsistency erodes soft power.

ALSO READ:

Receive News & Ratings Via Email - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.

The U. S. no longer projects a coherent identity to the community, which is how its soft power has diminished. Conflict between political parties, division within civil society, and changing domestic and foreign policies have eroded the image of the U. S. as an internally and externally consistent and united country.

Trump’s openness to have

S. officials counters the , charged with conspiracy against the U. S. by the Department of Justice and FBI, for example. And Trump himself is inconsistent: He switched his position on the urgency and timeliness of North Korea’s denuclearization, from to There are many different examples of these paradoxes.

How countries use soft power

Simply put, it’s what a state does with its own soft power and what different states do with it that matters. Having soft power means nothing if it’s not used or accepted by others. Consider soft power as a starting point, a vital but not wholly sufficient condition for have an affect on.

Hosting the 2018 World Cup, Russia sought to exercise its soft power on the world course and acquire some have an affect on in the process. But soft power is not self-determined.

ALSO READ:

By using soft power, a state can gain support through legitimacy and compliance through authority, which yields have an affect on. But for that to happen, different states have to buy into the image that state is advancing. Based on which countries follow and are followed, a hierarchy appears.

Therefore, the U. S. loss of soft power could jeopardize its ranking and level of have an affect on in the system. Legitimacy and authority operate based on co-optation and attraction, which links them to soft power. This is also why reliance on uncomfortable power could be even more damaging to the U. S.

China turns the tables

Lately, China has been quietly employing its soft power, with the prospect of with the EU as just one example. Soft power connotes a subtler and gentler way of influencing different countries, which China is displaying. More relevantly, China is showing more internal and external consistency in those areas that foster soft power.

This reinforces the argument I explore in my home work about how “winning friends” can have an affect on others and shift the power structure internationally.

Scholars and pundits feel China will have to overcome a number of economic, environmental, political and social obstacles before it can surpass the U. S. as the world’s superpower.

But for now, the burden may rest on the U. S. to overcome its own set of obstacles to defend and keep its position in the world order.

, PhD Candidate,

This article was originally published on . Read the .

Leave a Comment